As a kid, certain books (Jane Eyre, A Little Princess, Little Women, Girl of the Limberlost, The BFG, The Oz series, etc.) appeared and swallowed me whole, whales to my Jonah. I sat in the ribs’ corridor without a match, listening to blood course through the fish. But The Good Book was something else.
I was raised on the B-i-b-l-e and, when spit up by the whale, I happily wandered its blistering shores. With my family, in church study groups, or alone in my room, I rarely approached another book with the same eager, meditative diligence.
The Bible was always pre-parsed, each word a geode waiting to be cracked. We read verse by numbered verse, absurdly auditing every phrase. This was my education in semantics, and how I came to love the study of signs and meaning. I can't help but wonder how this early, intense study has shaped the way I read and interpret, well...everything else.
I'm grateful for my time spent poring over scripture. Despite my church’s fundamentalist leanings, I was allowed to speculate. When we gathered in a circle and discussed how Deuteronomy might apply to daily life, it was with the awed conviction that the Bible was a living, breathing thing; as much about our voices as its printed word. And we took it slow because, after all, it would be with us the rest of our lives.
I’m not sure when I last read the Bible. It’s weird what’s lodged in my mind, and all that’s passed through the sieve. This is the longest passage I can remember off the top of my head:
…in view of God’s mercy, offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God, for this is your spiritual act of worship. Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you can test and [something something] what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.
This was my favorite verse for years, which I had to look up just now:
I am still confident of this:
I will see the goodness of the LORD
in the land of the living.
Wait for the LORD;
be strong and take heart
and wait for the LORD.
What must it all sound like to other people?! Strangely, only through regarding the Bible as fact, or truth, can one truly interact with it as a poem (I think). Susan Stewart suggests that we receive poems the way we receive promises,
...in the sense not of something scripted or repeatable but of something that "happens," that "occurs" as an event and can be continually called on, called to mind, in the unfolding present.
Isn't that how we saw the Word, as one giant promise? Yet the one receiving doesn't always feel satisfied. A "believer," laying her whole self before the text, may sense the imbalance Stewart acknowledges in poetry; that "what goes out overwhelms what comes back." For me, scripture was like so much fruit surrounding the stone. But what happens when the stone dissolves?
I don't miss reading the Bible; this isn't about that. Basically, I've been trying to understand my preference for the phrase or caesura over chapter or prose. Recently I thought, Maybe it's because I was taught to value the verse so much. As in, the Bible's arbitrary meter. Oversimplification?
Of course, the psalms and epistles did more to me than that. When I say the Bible taught me to read, I mean it taught me to trust fictions. Implicitly. It taught me to make story my most intimate authority. And, like a poem, it's shortcomings shaped me, too. To paraphrase something else Stewart said, we begin to create when we feel estranged. Each biblical failure to answer my pre-and-post-adolescent questions allowed me to do some meaning-making of my own.